For citation:
Bessonov L. V. The “Planning–Modeling–Prediction” methodology as a basis for the architecture of clinical decision support systems in the surgical treatment of pathologies of the musculoskeletal system. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics, 2026, vol. 26, iss. 3, pp. 374-392. DOI: 10.18500/1816-9791-2026-26-3-374-392, EDN: KSPAUP
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Published online:
31.08.2026
Full text:
(downloads: 29)
Language:
Russian
Heading:
Article type:
Article
UDC:
531/534:[57+61]
EDN:
KSPAUP
The “Planning–Modeling–Prediction” methodology as a basis for the architecture of clinical decision support systems in the surgical treatment of pathologies of the musculoskeletal system
Autors:
Bessonov Leonid Valentinovich, Saratov State University
Abstract:
The paper formalizes the Planning–Modeling–Prediction (PMP) methodology as a basis for clinical decision support systems used in preoperative planning in traumatology and orthopedics. Two anatomical regions are considered: the spine--pelvic complex and the first ray of the foot, for which computational, software, and methodological results had been obtained previously. Comparison of these implementations made it possible to identify the common elements of the digital workflow: clinical and radiological input data, a set of admissible surgical options, a biomechanical model, computed indicators, criteria of geometric and mechanical admissibility, predictive interpretation, and a rule for comparing treatment options. A formal description of the CDSS architecture is proposed, separating the general sequence of transformations from anatomy-specific content. The implementation for the spine–pelvic complex is shown to be more complete in terms of modules and accumulated data, whereas the implementation for the first ray of the foot follows the same architectural logic with changes in the radiographic basis, intervention parameters, loading scenarios, and interpretation of the result. The proposed scheme can be used to transfer the PMP methodology to other problems in musculoskeletal surgery, provided that features, constraints, and admissibility criteria are specified separately for each new anatomical region.
Key words:
References:
- Berhouet J., Samargandi R. Emerging innovations in preoperative planning and motion analysis in orthopedic surgery. Diagnostics, 2024, vol. 14, iss. 13, art. 1321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14131321, PMID: 39001212
- Beskrovny A. S., Bessonov L. V., Golyadkina A. A., Dol A. V., Ivanov D. V., Kirillova I. V., Kossovich L. Yu., Sidorenko D. A. Development of a clinical decision support system in traumatology and orthopedics. Biomechanics as a tool for preoperative planning. Russian Journal of Biomechanics, 2021, vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 118–133 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15593/RZhBiomeh/2021.2.01, EDN: IEGOHC
- Ivanov D. V., Bessonov L. V., Kirillova I. V., Kossovich L. Yu., Kireev S. I. The concept of medical decision support systems in surgery of the spinal pelvic complex. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 517–535 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9791-2022-22-4-517-535, EDN: IJEHPA
- Bessonov L. V. Development of biomechanical modeling subsystem for the medical decision support system in traumatology and orthopedics. Russian Journal of Biomechanics, 2024, vol. 28, iss. 4, pp. 130–139 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15593/RZhBiomeh/2024.4.11, EDN: QBCZBN
- Bessonov L. V., Kirillova I. V., Falkovich A. S., Ivanov D. V., Dol A. V., Kossovich L. Yu. The “Planning–Modelling–Prediction” methodology for preoperative planning in trauma orthopaedics. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 359–380 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9791-2024-24-3-359-380, EDN: IQBZWJ
- Cho B. K., Kang D. H., Kang C., Lee G. S., Song J. H. Current concepts of radiographic evaluation and surgical treatment for hallux valgus deformity. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025, vol. 14, iss. 14, art. 5072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145072, PMID: 40725762
- Geleit R., Nunes G., Lam P., Ray R., Ferreira G. F., Lewis T. L. A systematic review of biomechanical studies utilising finite element analysis in hallux valgus deformity. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2025, vol. 31, iss. 8, pp. 684–694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2025.05.005, PMID: 40393832
- Ivanov D. V., Dol A. V., Bessonov L. V., Kireev S. I., Gulyaeva A. O. Method of mechanical tests for cantilever loading of the metatarsal foot bones. Russian Journal of Biomechanics, 2023, vol. 27, iss. 4, pp. 84–92 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15593/RZhBiomeh/2023.4.06, EDN: QWJFLW
- Polienko A. V., Ivanov D. V., Kireev S. I., Bessonov L. V., Muldasheva A. M., Olenko E. S. Numerical analysis of the stress-strain state of osteotomies of the first metatarsal bone. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics, 2023, vol. 23, iss. 4, pp. 496–511 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9791-2023-23-4-496-511, EDN: OZSOKF
- Maryankin K. A., Khaliulova A. R., Bessonov L. V., Kireev S. I., Ostrovsky N. V., Ivanov D. V. Review of the results of mechanical tests on the strength properties of the scarf and chevron osteotomies of the first metatarsal bone. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics, 2025, vol. 25, iss. 4, pp. 546–554 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9791-2025-25-4-546-554, EDN: ZYDAHE
- Maryankin K. A., Magomedov I. M., Bessonov L. V., Kireev S. I., Ivanov D. V. Modeling of osteotomies of the first metatarsal bone on a complete foot model in normal and osteoporotic conditions. Mechanics of Solids, 2025, vol. 60, pp. 5639–5647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0025654425604495
- Kireev S. I., Bessonov L. V., Dol A. V., Falkovich A. S., Kolgan A. S., Semenikhin M. S., Razin A. E.. Program for analysis and assessment of radiological criteria of deformity of the first ray of the foot “ORTUGA”. Certificate of State Registration of Computer Program no. 2023680486, 2023 (in Russian). EDN: DCZDFL
- Bessonov L. V. Program for preoperative planning of osteotomy of the first metatarsal bone using virtual reality technology. Certificate of State Registration of Computer Program no. 2025686719, 2025 (in Russian). EDN: SUXPWM
- Mayne D. Q., Rawlings J. B., Rao C. V., Scokaert P. O. M. Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica, 2000, vol. 36, iss. 6, pp. 789–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00214-9
- Kaelbling L. P., Littman M. L., Cassandra A. R. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence, 1998, vol. 101, iss. 1–2, pp. 99–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00023-X
- Dean M. C., Oeding J. F., Diniz P., Seil R., Samuelsson K.; ESSKA Artificial Intelligence Working Group. Leveraging digital twins for improved orthopaedic evaluation and treatment. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 2024, vol. 11, iss. 4, art. e70084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70084, PMID: 39530111
- Kossovich L. Yu., Kirillova I. V., Falkovich A. S., Bessonov L. V., Ivanov D. V., Golyadkina A. A., Dol A. V., Khomenets V. V., Kudyashev A. L. System for planning, modeling of fixation and endoprosthesis placement options and prognosis of successful placement for the elements of the spine-pelvic complex. Patent of the Russian Federation no. 2802670 C2, 2023 (in Russian). EDN: BXXJTB
- Wang M. C., Kiapour A., Massaad E., Shin J. H., Yoganandan N. A Guide to finite element analysis models of the spine for clinicians. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2024, vol. 40, iss. 1, pp. 38–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.7.SPINE23164, PMID: 37856396
- Jones A. C., Wilcox R. K. Finite element analysis of the spine: Towards a framework of verification, validation and sensitivity analysis. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2008, vol. 30, iss. 10, pp. 1287–1304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.006, PMID: 18986824
- Rohlmann A., Zander T., Rao M., Bergmann G. Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending. Journal of Biomechanics, 2009, vol. 42, iss. 7, pp. 884–890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.017, PMID: 19268291
- Nix S., Smith M., Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 2010, vol. 3, art. 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-21, PMID: 20868524
- Li X., Zhang L., Wang J., Wang Y., Dai G., Jiang W., Zheng H., Feng B., Tian W. Biomechanical comparison of five fixation methods in minimally invasive hallux valgus osteotomy: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 2025, vol. 12, art. 1701147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1701147, PMID: 41262445
- Wang C., Li C., Zhang R., Li Z., Zhang H., Zhang Y., Liu S., Chi X., Zhao R. Identification of radiographic characteristics associated with pain in hallux valgus patients: A preliminary machine learning study. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022, vol. 10, art. 943026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.943026
- Sutton R. T., Pincock D., Baumgart D. C., Sadowski D. C., Fedorak R. N., Kroeker K. I. An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine, 2020, vol. 3, art. 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y, PMID: 32047862
- Hak F., Guimarães T., Santos M. Towards effective clinical decision support systems: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 2022, vol. 17, iss. 8, art. e0272846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272846, PMID: 35969526
- Oettl F. C., Zsidai B., Yu Y., Pruneski J., Tischer T., Pareek A., Grassi A., Zaffagnini S., Hirschmann M. T., Samuelsson K. Standardised transparent orthopaedic reporting and modelling for AI (STORM-AI) — Guidelines for reporting artificial intelligence studies in orthopaedics from the ESSKA AI working group. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 2026, vol. 13, iss. 2, art. e70702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70702, PMID: 41947846
- Vasey B., Nagendran M., Campbell B., et al. ; DECIDE-AI expert group. Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. BMJ, 2022, vol. 377, art. e070904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070904, PMID: 35585198
- Hesamian M. H., Jia W., He X., Kennedy P. Deep learning techniques for medical image segmentation: Achievements and challenges. Journal of Digital Imaging, 2019, vol. 32, iss. 4, pp. 582–596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00227-x, PMID: 31144149
- Lee Y. H., Kim J. J., Jang I. G. Patient-specific phantomless estimation of bone mineral density and its effects on finite element analysis results: A feasibility study. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2019, vol. 2019, art. 4102410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4102410, PMID: 30719069
- Knowles N. K., Reeves J. M., Ferreira L. M. Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) derived Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in finite element studies: A review of the literature. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 2016, vol. 3, iss. 1, art. 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0072-2, PMID: 27943224
Received:
06.05.2026
Accepted:
11.06.2026
Published:
31.08.2026
- 82 reads