Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics

ISSN 1816-9791 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9005 (Online)


For citation:

Persova M. G., Soloveichik Y. G., Patrushev I. I., Ovchinnikova A. S. Numerical simulation of oil production using surfactant-polymer flooding. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics, 2021, vol. 21, iss. 4, pp. 544-558. DOI: 10.18500/1816-9791-2021-21-4-544-558, EDN: ZFNCTI

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Published online: 
30.11.2021
Full text:
(downloads: 977)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
004.94+517.95
EDN: 
ZFNCTI

Numerical simulation of oil production using surfactant-polymer flooding

Autors: 
Persova Marina G., Novosibirsk State Technical University
Soloveichik Yuri G., Novosibirsk State Technical University
Patrushev Ilya Igorevich, Novosibirsk State Technical University
Ovchinnikova Anastasia Sergeevna, Novosibirsk State Technical University
Abstract: 

The paper is devoted to the numerical modeling of oil field development using enhanced oil recovery technologies based on surfactant-polymer flooding. The proposed approach is aimed at assessing the possible efficiency and advisability of using surfactant-polymer flooding at the later stages of real fields development. A computational scheme for modeling three-phase multicomponent fluid flow in heterogeneous porous media, taking into account the formation of an emulsion phase, as a result of binding  water and oil due to surfactants influence, is described. This computational scheme is constructed similarly to the principle of the well-known IMPEC scheme and based on an implicit calculation of pressure by the finite element method and an explicit phase transfer between the cells of the finite element mesh at each time step. This makes it possible to calculate the effect of surfactants in each cell of the mesh independently of other cells. The scheme provides for the modeling of chemical reactions taking into account their rates and the amount of reactants in the mesh cells. The effect of enhanced oil recovery is achieved due to higher mobility and lower residual saturation of the emerging emulsion phase in comparison with the oil phase. Numerical experiments were carried out on a model of a real field with a large number of active wells and a highly heterogeneous porous medium. Three methods of field development are compared: water injection, polymer flooding, and injection of a surfactant-polymer solution. The convergence of the numerical scheme is shown for space and time mesh refinement. Compared to two-phase two-component flow, the additional computational costs associated with the formation of the emulsion phase and its subsequent flow do not exceed 10%.

Acknowledgments: 
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (project No. FSUN-2020-0012, development of computational scheme for modeling three-dimensional multiphase multicomponent flow) and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No.~20-31-90049, construction of a modeling scheme and study of the enhanced oil recovery method: surfactant-polymer flooding’).
References: 
  1. Aziz K., Settari A. Petroleum reservoir simulation. London, Applied Science Publishers, 1979. 476 p.
  2. Doyle B., Riviere B., Sekachev M. A multinumerics scheme for incompressible two-phase flow. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, vol. 370, art. 113213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113213
  3. Abd A., Abushaikha A. Velocity dependent up-winding scheme for node control volume finite element method for fluid flow in porous media. Scientific Reports, 2020, vol. 10, art. 4427. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61324-4
  4. Abushaikha A. S., Blunt M. J., Gosselin O. R., Pain C. C., Jackson M. D. Interface control volume finite element method for modelling multi-phase fluid flow in highly heterogeneous and fractured reservoirs. Journal of Computational Physics, 2015, vol. 298, pp. 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.05.024
  5. Schmid K. S., Geiger S., Sorbie K. S. Higher order FE-FV method on unstructured grids for transport and two-phase flow with variable viscosity in heterogeneous porous media. Journal of Computational Physics, 2013, vol. 241, pp. 416–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.12.017
  6. Zhang N., Yan B., Sun Q., Wang Y. Improving multiscale mixed finite element method for flow simulation in highly heterogeneous reservoir using adaptivity. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, vol. 154, pp. 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.04.012
  7. Moortgat J., Firoozabadi A. Higher-order compositional modeling of three-phase flow in 3D fractured porous media based on cross-flow equilibrium. Journal of Computational Physics, 2013, vol. 250, pp. 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.05.009
  8. Amooie M. A., Moortgat J. Higher-order black-oil and compositional modeling of multiphase compressible flow in porous media. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2017, vol. 105, pp. 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.03.016
  9. Deng Q., Ginting V. Locally conservative continuous Galerkin FEM for pressure equation in two-phase flow model in subsurfaces. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2017, vol. 74, pp. 1264–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10915-017-0493-9
  10. Odsæter L. H., Wheeler M. F., Kvamsdal T., Larson M. G. Postprocessing of nonconservative flux for compatibility with transport in heterogeneous media. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, vol. 315, pp. 799–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMA.2016.11.018
  11. Persova M. G., Soloveichik Yu. G., Grif A. M., Patrushev I. I. Flow balancing in FEM modelling of multi-phase flow in porous media. 2018 14th International Scientific-Technical Conference on Actual Problems of Electronic Instrument Engineering, APEIE 2018 – Proceedings. Novosibirsk, 2018, pp. 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEIE.2018.8545457
  12. Persova M. G., Soloveichik Yu. G., Vagin D. V., Grif A. M., Kiselev D. S., Patrushev I. I., Nasybullin A. V., Ganiev B. G. The design of high-viscosity oil reservoir model based on the inverse problem solution. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, vol. 199, art. 108245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108245
  13. Persova M. G., Soloveichik Yu. G., Vagin D. V., Grif A. M., Patrushev I. I., Ovchinnikova A. S. Oil production optimization based on the finite-element simulation of the multiphase flow in porous media and inverse problem solution. GeoBaikal 2020 (EAGE): Conference Proceedings. Irkutsk, 2020, vol. 2020, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202052021
  14. Patacchini L., De Loubens R., Moncorge A., Trouillaud A. Four-fluid-phase, fully implicit simulation of surfactant flooding. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 2014, vol. 17, pp. 271–285. https://doi.org/10.2118/161630-PA
  15. Massarweh O., Abushaikha A. S. The use of surfactants in enhanced oil recovery: A review of recent advances. Energy Reports, 2020, vol. 6, pp. 3150–3178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.009
  16. Lopes L. F., Silveira B. M. O, Moren R. B. Z. L. Rheological Evaluation of HPAM fluids for EOR Applications. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2014, vol. 14, pp. 35–41.
  17. Persova M. G., Soloveichik Y. G., Vagin D. V., Kiselev D. S., Koshkina Yu. I. Finite element solution to 3-D airborne time-domain electromagnetic problems in complex geological media using non-conforming hexahedral meshes. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2020, vol. 172, art. 103911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103911
  18. Persova M. G., Soloveichik Y. G., Ovchinnikova A. S., Patrushev I. I., Nasybullin A. V., Orekhov E. V. Numerical 3D simulation of enhanced oil recovery methods for high-viscosity oil field. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, vol. 1019, art. 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1019/1/012050
  19. Fink J. K. Chapter 16 — Enhanced oil recovery. In: J. Fink, ed. Petroleum Engineer’s Guide to Oil Field Chemicals and Fluids. Elsevier, 2015, pp. 477–565. https://doi.org/10. 1016/B978-0-12-803734-8.00016-3
  20. Christie M. A., Blunt M. J. Tenth SPE comparative solution project: A comparison of upscaling techniques. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 2001, pp. 308–316. https://doi.org/10.2118/72469-pa
  21. Corey A. T. The interelationship between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Producers Monthly, 1954, vol. 1, pp. 38–41.
Received: 
29.07.2021
Accepted: 
14.09.2021
Published: 
30.11.2021