Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics

ISSN 1816-9791 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9005 (Online)


For citation:

Vorobyev I. A. ML methods for assessing the risk of fraud in auto insurance. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 4, pp. 619-628. DOI: 10.18500/1816-9791-2024-24-4-619-628, EDN: HLJKIS

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Published online: 
25.11.2024
Full text:
(downloads: 57)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
004.891
EDN: 
HLJKIS

ML methods for assessing the risk of fraud in auto insurance

Autors: 
Vorobyev Ivan A., HSE Moscow Institute of Electronics and Mathematics
Abstract: 

The car insurance fraud level assessment is an urgent and complex task, which is largely due to the activities of fraudulent groups. For the confident management of insurance companies in the anti-fraud strategy, a tool to assess the current state of the claim’s portfolio is needed. Modern machine learning methods make it possible to carry out such an assessment using data on policyholders and insurance cases. When applying these approaches, a number of problems arise that do not allow achieving the required quality of fraud detection. These include class imbalance and the so-called concept drift, which arises as a result of changes in the scenarios of fraudsters’ schemes and the subjectivity of the expert assessment of a specific insurance case. This study proposes an approach to improve model metrics for detecting fraud in a claims portfolio. A numerical experiment conducted on two open data sets demonstrated a significant improvement in the detection rate of insurance fraud compared to classical modeling. Specifically, there was an increase in the completeness of fraud detection by 49 and 19 percentage points for the two datasets, respectively.

References: 
  1. Bao Y., Hilary G., Ke B. Artificial intelligence and fraud detection. In: Babich V., Birge J. R., Hilary G. (eds.) Innovative technology at the interface of finance and operations. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 11. Cham, Springer, 2022, pp. 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75729-8_8
  2. Subelj L., Furlan S., Bajec M. An expert system for detecting automobile insurance fraud using social network analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, vol. 38, iss. 1, pp. 1039–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.143
  3. Jin C., Feng Y., Li F. Concept drift detection based on decision distribution in inconsistent information system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2023, vol. 279, art. 110934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110934
  4. Gupta P., Varshney A., Khan M., Ahmed R., Shuaib M., Alam S. Unbalanced credit card fraud detection data: A machine learning-oriented comparative study of balancing techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 2023, vol. 218, pp. 2575–2584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.231
  5. Pant P., Srivastava P. Cost-sensitive model evaluation approach for financial fraud detection system. 2021 Second International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC). Coimbatore, India, 2021, pp. 1606–1611. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICESC51422.2021.9532741
  6. Voroncov K. V. Mathematical methods of learning from precedents (the theory of machine learning). “Mashinnoe obuchenie”, kurs lektsiy [“Machine Learning”, course of lectures], 2011. 141 p. Available at: http://www.machinelearning.ru/wiki/images/6/6d/Voron-ML-1.pdf (accessed September 22, 2023) (in Russian).
  7. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2006, vol. 27, iss. 8, pp. 861–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
  8. Subudhi S., Panigrahi S. Use of optimized Fuzzy C-Means clustering and supervised classifiers for automobile insurance fraud detection. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 2020, vol. 32, iss. 5, pp. 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.09.010
  9. Phua C., Alahakoon D. Minority report in fraud detection. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 2004, vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/1007730.1007738
  10. Itri B., Mohamed Y., Mohamed Q., Omar B. Performance comparative study of machine learning algorithms for automobile insurance fraud detection. 2019 Third International Conference on Intelligent Computing in Data Sciences (ICDS). Marrakech, Moroko, 2019, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDS47004.2019.8942277
Received: 
19.12.2023
Accepted: 
26.12.2023
Published: 
29.11.2024