Cite this article as:

Babeshko O. M., Babeshko V. A., Evdokimov V. S., Evdokimova O. ., Uafa G. N. Starting Earthquakes with the Parallel Faults of Lithospheric Plates. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Math. Mech. Inform., 2018, vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 370-380. DOI:


Starting Earthquakes with the Parallel Faults of Lithospheric Plates


The analysis of the models characterizing the preparation of starting earthquakes for different types of stresses on tectonic plates enabled to convey the analysis of a possibility of earthquakes for the case of the parallelfaults ,which simultaneously allows to figure ways of the irprediction, i.e.permits to reduce earth quake risk. The investigation of the arisen block structure applied the topological approach. The boundary problem imbeds into the topological structure and transforms in the functional equations. Automorphism application leads to the pseudodifferential equations, that are analyzed. It was proved that the starting earthquake can still take place in this case and the relevant conditions are derived.


1. Pevnev A. K. Puti k prakticheskomu prognozu zemletriasenii [Ways to practical earth-quake prediction]. Moscow, GEOS Publ., 2003. 154 p. (in Russian).
2. Reid N. F. The mechanism of the earthquake. The California earthquake of April 18, 1906. Rep. of the State Investigation Commiss., vol. 2, pt. 1. Washington, 1910. 56 p.
3. Golitsyn B. B. Izbrannye trudy [Selected works], vol. 2, Moscow, Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR, 1960. 465 p. (in Russian).
4. Gutenberg B., Richter C. Seismicity of the Earth and associated phenomena. Princeton Univ. Press, 1954, 310 p.
5. Rihter Ch. Elementarnaia seismologiia [Elementary seismology]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo inostrannoi literatury, 1963. 670 p. (in Russian).
6. Gamburtsev G. A. Perspektivnyi plan issledovanii po probleme „Izyskanie i razvitie prognoza zemletriasenii“ [Long-term plan of research on the problem „Research and development of earthquake prediction“]. Razvitie idei G. A. Gamburtseva v geofizike [Progress of G. A. Gamburtsev’s ideas in geophysics]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982, pp. 304–311 (in Russian).
7. Sadovskii M. A., Bolkhovitinov L. G., Pisarenko V. F. Deformirovanie geofizicheskoi sredy i seismicheskii protsess [Deformation of geophysical environment and seismic process]. Moscow, Nauka, 1987. 104 p. (in Russian).
8. Sobolev G. A. Osnovy prognoza zemletriasenii [Fundamentals of earthquake prediction]. Moscow, Nauka, 1993. 313 p. (in Russian).
9. Keilis-Borok V. A. Dinamika litosfery i prognoz zemletriasenii [Dynamics of the litho-sphere and earthquake prediction]. Priroda [Nature], 1989, no. 12, pp. 10–18 (in Russian).
10. Alekseev A. S., Geza N. I., Glinsky B. M., Emanov A. F., Kashun V. N., Kovalevskij V. V., Manshtejn A. K., Mihajlenko B. G., Seleznev V. S., Serdyukov S. V., Sobisevich A. L., Sobisevich L. E., Solov’ev V. M., Hajretdinov M. S., Chichinin I. S., Yushin V. I. Aktivnaia seismologiia s moshchnymi vibratsionnymi istochnikami [Active seismology withpowerful vibrational sources. Collective monograph]. Novosibirsk, Izdatel’stvo SO RAN, 2004. 388 p. (in Russian).
11. Geller R. J. Earthquake prediction: A critical review. Geophysical Journal International, 1997, vol. 131, iss. 3, pp. 425–450. DOI:
12. Kagan Y. Y. Are earthquake predictable? Geophysical Journal International, 1997, vol. 131, iss. 3, pp. 505–525. DOI:
13. Keer R. A. Earthquake prediction: Mexican quake shows one way to look for the big ones. Science, 1979, vol. 203, iss. 4383, pp. 860–862. DOI:
14. Main I. G., Meredith P. G. Classification of earthquake precursors from a fracture mechanics model. Tectonophysics, 1989, vol. 167, iss. 2–4, pp. 273–283. DOI:
15. Mogi K. Earthquake and fracture. Tectonophysics, 1967, vol. 5, iss 1, pp. 35–55. DOI:
16. Scholz C. H., Sykes L. R., Aggarwal Y. P. Earthquake prediction: A physical basis. Science, 1973, vol. 181, iss. 4102, pp. 803–809. DOI:
17. Freed A. M. Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic and postseismic stress transfer. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2005, vol. 33, pp. 335–367. DOI:
18. Mitchell E., Fialko Y., Brown K. M. Frictional properties of gabbro at conditions corresponding to slow slip events in subduction zones. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 2015, vol. 16, pp. 4006–4020. DOI:
19. Ide S., Berosa G. S. Does apparent stress vary earthquake? Geophysical Research Letters, 2001, vol. 28, iss. 17, pp. 3349–3352.
20. Di Toro G., Han R., Hirose T., De Paola N., Nielsen S., Mizoguchi K., Ferri F., Cocco M., Shimamoto T. Fault lubrication during earthquake. Nature, 2011, vol. 471, iss. 7339, pp. 494–498.
21. Babeshko V. A., Evdokimova O. V., Babeshko O. M. The problem of physical and mechanical precursors of an earthquake: Place, time, and intensity. Doklady Physics, 2016, vol. 61, iss. 2, pp. 92–97. DOI:
22. Babeshko V. A., Evdokimova O. V., Babeshko O. M. On the possibility of predicting some types of earthquake by a mechanical approach. Acta Mechanica, 2018, vol. 229, iss. 5, pp. 2163–2175. DOI:
23. Babeshko V. A., Evdokimova O. V., Babeshko O. M. A starting earthquake with harmoniceffects. Doklady Physics, 2016, vol. 61, iss. 11, pp. 551–554. DOI:
24. Vorovich I. I., Babeshko V. A. Dinamicheskie smeshannye zadachi teorii uprugosti dlianeklassicheskikh oblastei [Dynamic mixed problems of the theory of elasticity for nonclassical domains]. Moscow, Nauka, 1979. 320 p. (in Russian).
25. Babeshko V. A., Evdokimova O. V., Babeshko O. M. The theory of the starting earthquake. Ecological Bulletin of Research Centers of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation, 2016, no. 1, pt. 2, pp. 37–80. DOI:

Short text (in English): 
Full text: